<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Guy&#8217;s use of &#8220;When You Wish Upon a Star&#8221; in &#8220;I Need a Jew&#8221; found to be a non-infringing fair use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/03/family-guys-use-of-when-you-wish-upon-a-star-in-i-need-a-jew-found-to-be-a-non-infringing-fair-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/03/family-guys-use-of-when-you-wish-upon-a-star-in-i-need-a-jew-found-to-be-a-non-infringing-fair-use/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky There&#8217;s a Family Guy - Entertainment Agent Blog &#124; Entertainment Agent News</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/03/family-guys-use-of-when-you-wish-upon-a-star-in-i-need-a-jew-found-to-be-a-non-infringing-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-32459</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky There&#8217;s a Family Guy - Entertainment Agent Blog &#124; Entertainment Agent News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1077#comment-32459</guid>
		<description>[...] Guy for its reproduction of the tune with anti-Semitic lyrics. Judge Deborah A. Batts ruled that &#8220;[t]he song can be &#8216;reasonably perceived&#8217; to be commenting that any categorical vi... She also restated the law on parodies saying that a parody does not have to be effective to be fair [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guy for its reproduction of the tune with anti-Semitic lyrics. Judge Deborah A. Batts ruled that &#8220;[t]he song can be &#8216;reasonably perceived&#8217; to be commenting that any categorical vi&#8230; She also restated the law on parodies saying that a parody does not have to be effective to be fair [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOLT Digest &#187; Bourne Co. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. &#124; Harvard Journal of Law &#38; Technology</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/03/family-guys-use-of-when-you-wish-upon-a-star-in-i-need-a-jew-found-to-be-a-non-infringing-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-30459</link>
		<dc:creator>JOLT Digest &#187; Bourne Co. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. &#124; Harvard Journal of Law &#38; Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1077#comment-30459</guid>
		<description>[...] provides the basic facts. Exclusive Rights offers an overview of the opinion, examining the court&#8217;s treatment of the parody versus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] provides the basic facts. Exclusive Rights offers an overview of the opinion, examining the court&#8217;s treatment of the parody versus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

