<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royalty Logic&#8217;s Appointments Clause challenge of the Copyright Royalty Judges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/03/royalty-logics-appointments-clause-challenge-of-the-copyright-royalty-judges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/03/royalty-logics-appointments-clause-challenge-of-the-copyright-royalty-judges/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/03/royalty-logics-appointments-clause-challenge-of-the-copyright-royalty-judges/comment-page-1/#comment-31668</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1187#comment-31668</guid>
		<description>The decision in Eltra v. Ringer may be of interest in this context (http://altlaw.org/v1/cases/535269)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decision in Eltra v. Ringer may be of interest in this context (<a href="http://altlaw.org/v1/cases/535269" rel="nofollow">http://altlaw.org/v1/cases/535269</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

