<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chain of title unclear in infringement suit over classic Marx action figures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/04/chain-of-title-unclear-in-infringement-suit-over-classic-marx-action-figures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/04/chain-of-title-unclear-in-infringement-suit-over-classic-marx-action-figures/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/04/chain-of-title-unclear-in-infringement-suit-over-classic-marx-action-figures/comment-page-1/#comment-30873</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1288#comment-30873</guid>
		<description>This might be the classic bad facts beget bad law circumstance.  The purchase of the copyrights for $10 looks to me like the plaintiffs may have been interested in copyright trolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be the classic bad facts beget bad law circumstance.  The purchase of the copyrights for $10 looks to me like the plaintiffs may have been interested in copyright trolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court grants summary judgement over failed copyright transfer. &#124; Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark - Entertainment Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/04/chain-of-title-unclear-in-infringement-suit-over-classic-marx-action-figures/comment-page-1/#comment-30849</link>
		<dc:creator>Court grants summary judgement over failed copyright transfer. &#124; Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark - Entertainment Lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1288#comment-30849</guid>
		<description>[...] (Hat tip to: Copyright Law Blog: Exclusive Rights.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Hat tip to: Copyright Law Blog: Exclusive Rights.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Firemark</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/04/chain-of-title-unclear-in-infringement-suit-over-classic-marx-action-figures/comment-page-1/#comment-30847</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1288#comment-30847</guid>
		<description>What about a court-order transferring the copyright, such as in a Bankruptcy, or a foreclosure action?  Would the Court order satisfy the requirements of section 204?

From the sound things in this opinion, probably not?

What then, would the Court do?  Order the trustee or Debtor to sign such a transfer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a court-order transferring the copyright, such as in a Bankruptcy, or a foreclosure action?  Would the Court order satisfy the requirements of section 204?</p>
<p>From the sound things in this opinion, probably not?</p>
<p>What then, would the Court do?  Order the trustee or Debtor to sign such a transfer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

