Comments on: Judge Sotomayor on copyright (and a smattering of other soft-IP) http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/05/judge-sotomayor-on-copyright-and-a-smattering-of-other-soft-ip/ A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:13:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Gregory L. Hudson http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/05/judge-sotomayor-on-copyright-and-a-smattering-of-other-soft-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-33696 Gregory L. Hudson Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:04:43 +0000 http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1735#comment-33696 Allow me to introduce myself. I am Gregory L. Hudson, the Pro Se Litigant in Hudson v. Universal Studios; whereby Judge Sotomayor presided and rightfully REMANDED my case back to the SDNY. Prior to this REMAND, my first appeal was affirmed by 3 white male judges, including Michael Mukasey all of whom had pre determined that they were not going to rule in my favor in spite of the facts, the evidence and the rule of law. On this appeal, Judge Sotomayor had the courage and intergrity to rule in the name of justice as opposed to who the parties involved were. I specifically requested that the 2nd circuit did not put 3 white, male, jewish judges on that panel and was fortunate enough to have been blessed with Sotomayor. It comes as no surprised to me that she is now being considered as a supreme court judge. By the way, the same SDNY court has dismissed my case again after the REMAND. I filed my appeal on June 12, 2009 and the defendants' attorneys promptly requested an additional 30 which was granted to file their opposition. It never ceases to amaze me that all of these law blogs and/or law journal seldom if ever report rulings against certain law firms...especially when they are beaten by Pro Se Litigants. If you are truly interested in justice and due process of the law for all...take a look at my appeal brief 09-0187-cv. If the coruption and judicial misconduct doen't turn your stomach...then you have lost all of that which makes us human. Respectfully, Gregory L. Hudson, Pro Se Hudson v. Unversal Studios Allow me to introduce myself. I am Gregory L. Hudson, the Pro Se Litigant in Hudson v. Universal Studios; whereby Judge Sotomayor presided and rightfully REMANDED my case back to the SDNY. Prior to this REMAND, my first appeal was affirmed by 3 white male judges, including Michael Mukasey all of whom had pre determined that they were not going to rule in my favor in spite of the facts, the evidence and the rule of law. On this appeal, Judge Sotomayor had the courage and intergrity to rule in the name of justice as opposed to who the parties involved were. I specifically requested that the 2nd circuit did not put 3 white, male, jewish judges on that panel and was fortunate enough to have been blessed with Sotomayor. It comes as no surprised to me that she is now being considered as a supreme court judge.

By the way, the same SDNY court has dismissed my case again after the REMAND. I filed my appeal on June 12, 2009 and the defendants’ attorneys promptly requested an additional 30 which was granted to file their opposition.

It never ceases to amaze me that all of these law blogs and/or law journal seldom if ever report rulings against certain law firms…especially when they are beaten by Pro Se Litigants.

If you are truly interested in justice and due process of the law for all…take a look at my appeal brief 09-0187-cv. If the coruption and judicial misconduct doen’t turn your stomach…then you have lost all of that which makes us human.

Respectfully,
Gregory L. Hudson, Pro Se
Hudson v. Unversal Studios

]]> By: Dissident Voice : Sonia Sotomayor: She’s No Clarence Thomas, But No Thurgood Marshall Either http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/05/judge-sotomayor-on-copyright-and-a-smattering-of-other-soft-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-32651 Dissident Voice : Sonia Sotomayor: She’s No Clarence Thomas, But No Thurgood Marshall Either Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:04:52 +0000 http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1735#comment-32651 [...] in Manhattan, and another seven as partner at the international law firm of Pavia & Harcourt. Summaries of her decisions are hard to find. Although much is made of the fact that she will be only the [...] [...] in Manhattan, and another seven as partner at the international law firm of Pavia & Harcourt. Summaries of her decisions are hard to find. Although much is made of the fact that she will be only the [...]

]]> By: admin http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/05/judge-sotomayor-on-copyright-and-a-smattering-of-other-soft-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-32442 admin Fri, 29 May 2009 02:10:07 +0000 http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1735#comment-32442 C.T., thanks for the thanks. C.T., thanks for the thanks.

]]> By: C.T. http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/05/judge-sotomayor-on-copyright-and-a-smattering-of-other-soft-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-32423 C.T. Thu, 28 May 2009 17:14:37 +0000 http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1735#comment-32423 Thank you for putting this together. Thank you for putting this together.

]]> By: Sotomayor on Copyright Law « Andy on the Road http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/05/judge-sotomayor-on-copyright-and-a-smattering-of-other-soft-ip/comment-page-1/#comment-32420 Sotomayor on Copyright Law « Andy on the Road Thu, 28 May 2009 16:04:09 +0000 http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=1735#comment-32420 [...] theroad — Andy @ 11:04 am As a followup to Monday’s post, head over to the blog Ex(c)lusive Rights to see an impressive list of all of the copyright/soft-IP decisions Judge Sotomayor did while [...] [...] theroad — Andy @ 11:04 am As a followup to Monday’s post, head over to the blog Ex(c)lusive Rights to see an impressive list of all of the copyright/soft-IP decisions Judge Sotomayor did while [...]

]]>