<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SG on Cablevision cert petition: &#8220;[A]rtificial truncation of the possible grounds for decision would make this case an unsuitable vehicle for clarifying the proper application of copyright principles&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/06/sg-on-cablevision-cert-petition-artificial-truncation-of-the-possible-grounds-for-decision-would-make-this-case-an-unsuitable-vehicle-for-clarifying-the-proper-application-of-copyright-principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/06/sg-on-cablevision-cert-petition-artificial-truncation-of-the-possible-grounds-for-decision-would-make-this-case-an-unsuitable-vehicle-for-clarifying-the-proper-application-of-copyright-principles/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
</channel>
</rss>

