<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court finds that putting photos on the internet doesn&#8217;t make them U.S. works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/10/court-finds-that-putting-photos-on-the-internet-doesnt-make-them-us-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/10/court-finds-that-putting-photos-on-the-internet-doesnt-make-them-us-works/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOLT Digest &#187; Moberg v. 33T LLC &#124; Harvard Journal of Law &#38; Technology</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/10/court-finds-that-putting-photos-on-the-internet-doesnt-make-them-us-works/comment-page-1/#comment-38469</link>
		<dc:creator>JOLT Digest &#187; Moberg v. 33T LLC &#124; Harvard Journal of Law &#38; Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2709#comment-38469</guid>
		<description>[...] &amp; Loeb LLP provides an overview of the case. Ex©lusive Rights suggests that the outcome was largely inconsequential. But CyberLaw Currents sees the case as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &amp; Loeb LLP provides an overview of the case. Ex©lusive Rights suggests that the outcome was largely inconsequential. But CyberLaw Currents sees the case as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

