<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Copyright Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/10/monday-copyright-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/10/monday-copyright-roundup/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.T.</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/10/monday-copyright-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-38500</link>
		<dc:creator>C.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2725#comment-38500</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note to let you know that I very much enjoyed this post.  I am a regular reader of your blog, but I had not noticed a &quot;Monday roundup&quot; in the past.  I really like this format for a weekly post.  With so much copyright literature popping up regularly in journals and SSRN, I find that I miss out on a lot of interesting material.  

On a side note...

I raised the argument you presented in your paper criticizing the general performance right at a recent music conference in which the Performance Rights Act was a topic of discussion.  I found your article very intriguing, particularly in light of Bill Patry&#039;s arguments in his new book that we ought use empirical evidence in assessing copyright policy.  Ironically, my comment was met with the sort of &quot;moral panic&quot; and rhetorical flourishes that are the central focus of Mr. Patry&#039;s book.  

Thanks again for all of your work.

C.T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note to let you know that I very much enjoyed this post.  I am a regular reader of your blog, but I had not noticed a &#8220;Monday roundup&#8221; in the past.  I really like this format for a weekly post.  With so much copyright literature popping up regularly in journals and SSRN, I find that I miss out on a lot of interesting material.  </p>
<p>On a side note&#8230;</p>
<p>I raised the argument you presented in your paper criticizing the general performance right at a recent music conference in which the Performance Rights Act was a topic of discussion.  I found your article very intriguing, particularly in light of Bill Patry&#8217;s arguments in his new book that we ought use empirical evidence in assessing copyright policy.  Ironically, my comment was met with the sort of &#8220;moral panic&#8221; and rhetorical flourishes that are the central focus of Mr. Patry&#8217;s book.  </p>
<p>Thanks again for all of your work.</p>
<p>C.T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

