<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Copyright Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2010/02/daily-copyright-roundup-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2010/02/daily-copyright-roundup-9/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oxana</title>
		<link>http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2010/02/daily-copyright-roundup-9/comment-page-1/#comment-44005</link>
		<dc:creator>oxana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=3271#comment-44005</guid>
		<description>Give copyright back to the authors 

Actually, copyright law itself is not that complex.  The structure behind it is. Collecting societies, music publishers and record companies, who knows what they are doing? Imagine, you’re a small artist who wants to be famous. Sign here, sign here and sign here. Before you know it you don’t have any rights left, including income from gigs and merchandising.  It used to be evident that we wanted to reward the  creativity of people. Nowadays, it’s not that obvious anymore.  My idea is that we should not discuss copyright law, but how to protect the performing, reproduction and any other rights of the music authors.  Luckily I’m not the only one who is worried. It can’t be any coincidence that the Featured Artists Coalition was founded. They want the artists to have more control of their music  and a much fairer share of the profits it generates in the digital age.  But there is also another way.   The internet is a promising marketing environment, fit for individual management of copyright and the delivery of rights on demand to users. In these circumstances the music authors are in full control of their rights. And is that not what it used to be all about? Giving the advantages of being creative to such persons? I hope the authors will be more and more aware of the fact that they have a strong legal position. Check out VillaMusicRights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give copyright back to the authors </p>
<p>Actually, copyright law itself is not that complex.  The structure behind it is. Collecting societies, music publishers and record companies, who knows what they are doing? Imagine, you’re a small artist who wants to be famous. Sign here, sign here and sign here. Before you know it you don’t have any rights left, including income from gigs and merchandising.  It used to be evident that we wanted to reward the  creativity of people. Nowadays, it’s not that obvious anymore.  My idea is that we should not discuss copyright law, but how to protect the performing, reproduction and any other rights of the music authors.  Luckily I’m not the only one who is worried. It can’t be any coincidence that the Featured Artists Coalition was founded. They want the artists to have more control of their music  and a much fairer share of the profits it generates in the digital age.  But there is also another way.   The internet is a promising marketing environment, fit for individual management of copyright and the delivery of rights on demand to users. In these circumstances the music authors are in full control of their rights. And is that not what it used to be all about? Giving the advantages of being creative to such persons? I hope the authors will be more and more aware of the fact that they have a strong legal position. Check out VillaMusicRights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

